No sadly, I have not charmed a PLA beauty (not yet…) but it
is time to unveil the big 2013 project!
Red Dragon Struggling
The year is 2025.< play music from Ghost Recon!>
10
years before a Russian conventional invasion of China coupled with a limited
nuclear exchange had left the once powerful People Republic of China weakened
and in need of international assistance. A multinational force came to the
rescue but accepted only a stalemate as result and a temporary cease fire
leaving the Russians in control of the industrialized northern China and some
of its restless western regions . Now in
a land beset by local warlords, bandits, occupation forces, and squabbling and
rapacious allies the fate of the world
hinges again on the balance. Accompanied by a failed nuclear strike the Russian
Army and its proxies, the Uighur National Army, the Korean People Army, and the
newly established Chinese Party of Peasant and Workers are again on the
offensive.
Facing
them is a shaky coalition made of the People Republic of China, the United
States and its Nato allies, Australian, Vietnam, Japan, and South Korea, former
enemies turned allies of convenience. With a political leadership in far away
countries in denial of the crisis it is one shoulders of the soldiers on the
grounds, leftover of an unfinished war to held the tide at bay. Undermanned
units with outdated equipment, heirs of budgets cuts and botched programs are
thrown in the fire in an arrogant display of strength to hide their real
weaknesses.
Will
the Allies held the line? Will the Russian Army remove the Chinese threat once
for all and restore the dreams of the Czars and the Soviets?
The
Setting:
Well
it looks far fetched… but what hypothetical campaign does not look this way?
Well, the recent PLA releases from GHQ, Heroic&Ros, Rebel Miniatures and
the announcement of the new Kick starter from Empress had made me thinking. I like East Asia, in my
day ‘job’ I pretend to be an East Asia specialist. Still I am becoming a bit
uneasy with the idea of PRC being the source of all evil… well, I have friends
in the PLA, friends in China at large, it made me uneasy casting the stunning
young woman with whom I had the pleasure to have a lunch in the part of the
villain of my games. It would also meant that I have to cast a lot of people in
that part, some of my old students, some of the people I have helped in
revising essays and even writing doctoral proposal. People who have been guest at
my home too… let’s face it I am not overly anti-PRC. Despite what the US Navy
and some other people are saying the PRC has shown a large amount of strategic
(but not operational or tactical sadly) restraint in the past decades. One of
the thing wargamers (especially the bunch of idiotic pundits that often
frequent TMP…) and policy makers forget
is that Russia and China have their own spats for centuries. I am also willing
to cast the Russian government in a more villainous roles (Georgia anyone?).
There is also an historical titbit that had always puzzled me. Russia often has
regarded areas we now associate with China has its own. As recently as 1945
Josif Stalin had forced a Sino-Soviet friendship treaty (what a name) on Jiang
Shie-ji (Chiang Kai-Scheck) giving Sinkiang and Manchuria to Soviet Union and
retaking Port Arthur, these areas stayed Russians more or less until the
Stalin’s death and the end of the Korean War. I am not overly persuaded
Russia Two superpowers sharing a land
borders are quite interesting and create a quite volatile situation.
Thus
I have a good background for a campaign setting. Now… I wanted to distance it a
bit more from today because… because I do not want to be too pessimist. I wanted also to accommodate two kind of
warfare, high speed high intensity armoured clashes (smaller scales involved)
and more infantry actions (28mm). This for two reasons. First, if you will ever
read my academic flights of fancy you will realize I am quite enthralled by the
idea of hybrid warfare were you shift between full conventional and small scale
patrols. It is much more common than we thinks. Second I like 28mm miniatures
but I am not so rich to deploy full tank supported mechanized companies and
have a table to give them the proper combat space, I also think 28mm battles,
at least contemporary ones, are better if kept small, because you can then put
more effort in the miniatures. So my
setting has to have place for both tank clashes and small patrols. I am also
interested in the interwar period in China. I watched the Sand Pebbles, read
books and did serious research. Thus is created a setting were Foreign forces
are in china, formally doing ‘peacekeeping’ or ‘supporting’ roles but, until
the campaign starts, also doing what their historical counterparts did in the
interwar period, supporting their countries interests in China.
Is
this situation possible? Why not? We have seen a rise on conventional and
semi-conventional warfare despite what the outspoken prophets of COIN tell us.
We have also seen assertive Russia and the fact that the US conventional and
nuclear deterrence is taken less seriously than before (Korea). We have also a
quite instructive example of what this could lead us in the form of 1950’s
invasion of South Korea. And if people want to debate that US and Russia have
never fought head to head… non one has ever heard of the Black Tuesday over
Nam-si? Well I find my scenario
possible, not highly probable now, and not even auspicable (even if I think
that if we have a global war I will prefer to side with the PRC than with the
Russians). As far the nuclear element
goes… well I ma not so sure about deterrence as I was five years ago. Hopefully
I am wrong, but if deterrence fails nuclear weapons become just an additional
part of an arsenal.
One
last word is required on the Japanese… I like Japan, I have Japanese friends, I
like the Self Defense Force, I had also meet some JSDF officers, including a
former Chief of the Fleet. I have also studied the Imperial Japanese Army, read
Chang’s Rape of Nanking and Drea’s Japan Imperial Army. I know what they did in
China, but the idea of having them uneasy allies with the Chinese (albeit with
some less than pleasant traits in the background stories) is interesting. I am
also a bit uneasy with the continued awful portrayal of the Japanese in Chinese
Media (varying from utterly evil bloodthirsty people, to utterly evil bunch of
incompetent extras ready to be butchered by the hero… it is interesting that
they always complain on anything Tokyo’s government said and then continually bashing the Japanese).
Having them side by side it is my answer.
A Project is Born
The Plan
Well
I love telling stories, but first of all you need to get the basics done. In
our fields basics means, miniatures, terrain, and rules. How I plan to proceed? Well this is my big
2013 project so I will devote a lot of my spare time to it. Also a lot of my
meagre financial resources will go into it… It will also be an hybrid project,
combining different scales and different medium. Rest assured that this will
not be a metagaming experience, tried it in the past did not work, just I want
to tackle several different aspects of the problem. I have several map based
games involving the belligerent, including the very good Red Dragon Rising from
Bruce Costello. Yet they are cast in the usual PLA versus the Blue team.
Recently I scored an old used copy of S&T China War. It is a little nifty
game that has a very nice map of china with population and resources and cover…
well a Soviet invasion in the late seventies early eighties. I think that with
minimal addition (like the one Brian Train did in his 2008 civil war scenario)
it will be perfect. It will be a quick
way to test the strategic and operational setting. This is phase one.
Phase
two will involve my extensive 6mm collection. I have sizable forces for every
nation involved in my plot except the PLA but GHQ and H&R will cover this
void (incidentally I also need some additional French). We need Koreans, but I
have been told something is moving on this area. I will use mainly Strike
Legion: Planetary Ops taking material from their WW3 supplement. It is a
battalion level game. Units are battalions composed by companies, 1inch to the kilometer. Why this approach? Well it allow me to have all the elements on the
table, combat force, logistic and artillery, air-power. I also like the idea to
be able to field a full division in a playable manner. I will have to add some
PLA brigades to my force mix, but it will be reasonably easy. I will play the
action along the ‘Corridor’ the thin line connecting The ‘safe area’ of the Yangtze basin to
Beijing. Here the bulk of the Russian offensive will unfold. There will be
scenario covering large tank battles.
Farther
south the 25th Infantry Division, the Marines, and some allied units will push north from Shanghai
to reinforce the Corridor, Phase 2. Strykers in action… well the Stryker is cool, maybe not the best
thing you want in a real war but despite its shortcoming it is here to
stay. Khurasan miniatures is releasing
some nice new US Army troops and vehicles in 15mm and also a T-90. I have
already a good collection of PP ones with some QRF and loads of vehicles, I
have also French and British troops and Soviet/Russians. I can add some PLA
from Rebel, but they will be simple leg infantry, there are no modern Chinese
vehicle in 15mm… sadly. Some scenario here will scale down from massed action
to smaller stuff in 15mm, using Cold War Commander. I plan to have company
actions where one stand is a squad or weapons team and Vehicles represent 2 or
three (as in Battlefront WW2) real vehicles. I have found this is a great way
to use combined arms companies in 15mm. It will not only be a full conventional
war. Troops will have also to keep the Line of Communication open… here the
invention of the CPPW will become useful to have some nice convoy actions.
Phase
three will 28mm… It will not follow large units or companies, but squads and
reduced platoons fighting to keep Shanghai secure and the so called ‘Blue Line’
of the Yangtze clear. The PLA and the multinational allies will be fighting
their daily battles in rice paddies, canals, and small villages. Force on Force
and Crossfire (with some little tweaks) will be used, I am also eyeing the new
Chain of Command from TFL… it could be easily adapted. Some of the battles will
overlap actions from Phase Two, but in smaller tactical scale, heroic and not
so heroic character will made their appearance.
To support Phase three I have my Empress modern british that will play
the part of the Royal Marines of the shanghai garrison and the Infantry Brigade
from Hong Kong (I mentioned the help was not completely free). I am drooling
for an Imprint Challenger but this time I will refrain (maybe next serious
job). As much I love the Charlie 2 I want some gritty infantry focus. Also
because I am afraid (more on that on another post) the British Army has, like
some other European armies, embraced a twisted approach to lightness and
flexibility. The heavy force will be in
a different area of China, defending Xian (and the house of one of my best
friends) from the Uighur National Army.
Well I hace Charlie 2 in 6mm and 15mm I can re-role for a while. Next
allied force will be the US Army. I have a decent Empress force, 1 M1A2, 2
Bradleys, plenty of hummers in 28mm, A Stryker would be nice… or not, again
this year expense are to be controlled. I already have Strykers in 6mm, Acheson
has a nice one in 15mm and Khurasan is also doing them shortly. Can afford only
to ‘strykerize’ in 15mm or 28mm, have to decide, or maybe I can just infiltrate
a single Stryker in 28mm. I have Eureka modern marines and SEALS. I want the
new ones from Empress. Vehicles… at the moment the only 28mm vehicles for this
project is the Imprint AAV7A1. You need the Tuna Boat, trust me you need
it. Plus I need PLA, I have a single
squad from Colonel Stone Compound. Need the new Empress. On the plus side I have some Eureka (small
Kriegsspiel sub-brand) Japanese.
This sounds like a great project and one I will be following with great interest. I love you backgrounds as they are always so 'plausible' even when clearly fictitious.
ReplyDeleteI also like the idea of the PRC being 'the good guys'. very interesting.
I am also intrigued by the idea of mixing scales withing a campaign to simulate different types of battles ans that sound like a great idea. As a 28mm scale gamer myself I have always been fascinated, but never really tried microarmour. I might have to give it a go now.
If you like tanks and want more than a couple per side in our normal table Microarmour is the only way forward.It also allow you to have different support elements on the table like SPG and stuff you do not use in 28mm or even 15mm. Plus I already have a lot of stuff and it is cheaper than 28mm...
ReplyDeleteAs PLA being good... well I am organizing a trip to Bovington with a PLA tanker who is also a colleague in King's, I have so many Chinese friends that I feel difficult to consider them evil anymore. some of my miniatures have also found their way to China...
As far background goes, being plausible is quite easy, it is also a quite good exercise to interpret current news. 99% you miss, but in the end well... reality often is implausible (as when I told a friend on 28 July 1990 that Iraq was going to invade Kuwait and we would have gone to war for it and was ridiculed as 'fantasy').